The effect of entanglement and non-inertial frame on four-qubit  quantum game

Rashidi, S.S

doi:10.18869/acadpub.ijpr.16.1.111

The effect of entanglement and non-inertial frame on four-qubit quantum game

Author

S.S Rashidi

https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijpr.16.1.111

Abstract

The effect of increasing quantum bits and Unruh effect on quantum Prisoners’ dilemma has been investigated for both entangled and unentangled initial states. The Nash equilibrium, as an important result of quantum game theory, was obtained through the different payoffs resulted from choosing various strategies. It has been shown that the non-inertial frame disturbs the symmetry of the game. Actually, selection of the basic quantum strategy by players and calculating the payoff of the game via the density matrix of 4-qubit quantum states can represent a scale of influence of entanglement in a quantum mechanical system

Keywords

entanglement

Nash equilibrium

non-inertial frame

Pareto optimal

quantum game

1. D A Meyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1052.
2. J von Neumann, O Morgenstern, “The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior”, Princeton University Press (1944).
3. J Eisert, J Wilkens, and M Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3077.
4. L Marinatto and T Weber, Phys. Lett. A 272 (2000) 291.
5. H Li, J Du, and S Massar, Phys. Lett. A 306 (2002) 73.
6. C F Lo and D Kiang, Phys. Lett. A 321 (2004) 94.
7. A P Flitney and D Abbott, Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 062318.
8. A Iqbal and A H Toor, Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 052328.
9. A P Flitney, J Ng and D Abbott, Physica A 314 (2002) 35.
10. L Goldenberg, L Vaidman, and S Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 3356.
11. S Khan, M Ramzan, and M K Khan, Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 (2010) 080302.
12. L K Chen, H Ang, D Kiang, L C Kwek, and C F Lo, Phys. Lett. A 316 (2003) 317.
13. A P Flitney and D Abbott, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 449.
14. S Khan, M Ramzan, and M K. Khan Int. J. Theo Phys. 49 (2010) 31.
15. P M Alsing, I Fuentes-Schuller, R B Mann, and T E Tessier, Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 032326.
16. Y Ling, S He, W Qiu and H Zhang, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 40 (2007) 9025.
17. R M Gingrich and C Adami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 270402.
18. Q Pan and J Jing, Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 024302.
19. I Fuentes-Schuller and R B Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 120404.
20. H Terashima and M Ueda, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 1 (2003) 93.
21. H Goudarzi and S Beyrami, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 (2012) 225301.
22. M Kh Salman khan, Quantum Inf. Process 12 (2013) 1351.
23. H Goudarzi and S Birami, Iranian Journal of Physics Research 12, 4 (2013) 387.
24. P C W Davies, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 8 (1975) 609.
25. S Takagi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 88 (1986) 1.
26. W Unruh, and R Wald, Phys. Rev. D 29 (1984) 1047.