Author
Abstract
In order to see the occurrence of magnetic reconnection in the solar chromosphere, we investigate the behavior of non-linear perturbations on the magneto hydro dynamic (MHD) equations. Numericalstudy of the resistive tearing instability in a current sheet is presented by considering the MHD framework.To do this, the four field model is applied. It is shown based on the simulation that the non-linear terms make the reconnection occur faster during the spicule life time in the chromosphere.
Keywords
1. M Zhang and B C Low, Astrophys. J., 576 (2002) 1005.
2. E R Priest and T Forbes, “Magnetic reconnection: MHD Theory and Applications”, Cambridge Uni. Press (2000).
3. E G Zweibel and M Yamada, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 47 (2009) 291.
4. P Antolin and K Shibata, Astrophys. J., 712 (2010) 494.
5. P A Sweet, in IAU Symp. 6, Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Phys., ed. B Lehnert,. Cambridge Uni. Press (1958) 123.
6. E N Parker, Astrophys. J., 8 (1963) 177.
7. E R Priest and T Forbes, “Magnetic reconnection: MHD Theory and Applications,” Cambridge Uni. Press (2000).
8. Y E Litvinenko, Astrophys. J., 515 (1999) 435.
9. P A Sturrock, Astrophys. J., 521 (1999) 451.
10. S Nasiri and L Yousefi, Iranian Journal of Physics Research, 5, 3 (2005) 145.
11. B De Pontieu, et al., Science, 318 (2007)1574.
12. T V Zaqarashvili, R Erdelyi, Space Sci. Rev., 149 (2009) 335.
13. K Murawski and T V Zaqarashvili, Astrophys. & Space Sci., 519 (2010) A8.
14. H Ebadi, T V Zaqarashvili, and I Zhelyazkov, Astrophys. & Space Sci., 337 (2012a) 33.
15. J He, E Marsch, Ch Tu, and H Tian, Astrophys. J., 705 (2009) 217.
16. A Takeuchi and K Shibata, Astrophys. J., 546 (2001) L73.
17. R Fitzpatrick, Phys. of Plasma, 11 (2003) 3.
18. Z Fazel and H Ebadi, Iranian Journal of Physics Research, 14, 3 (2014) 73.
19. Z Fazel and H Ebadi, Astrophys. & Space Sci., 353(2014) 47.
20. T Yokoyama and K Shibata, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 48 (1996) 353.
2. E R Priest and T Forbes, “Magnetic reconnection: MHD Theory and Applications”, Cambridge Uni. Press (2000).
3. E G Zweibel and M Yamada, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 47 (2009) 291.
4. P Antolin and K Shibata, Astrophys. J., 712 (2010) 494.
5. P A Sweet, in IAU Symp. 6, Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Phys., ed. B Lehnert,. Cambridge Uni. Press (1958) 123.
6. E N Parker, Astrophys. J., 8 (1963) 177.
7. E R Priest and T Forbes, “Magnetic reconnection: MHD Theory and Applications,” Cambridge Uni. Press (2000).
8. Y E Litvinenko, Astrophys. J., 515 (1999) 435.
9. P A Sturrock, Astrophys. J., 521 (1999) 451.
10. S Nasiri and L Yousefi, Iranian Journal of Physics Research, 5, 3 (2005) 145.
11. B De Pontieu, et al., Science, 318 (2007)1574.
12. T V Zaqarashvili, R Erdelyi, Space Sci. Rev., 149 (2009) 335.
13. K Murawski and T V Zaqarashvili, Astrophys. & Space Sci., 519 (2010) A8.
14. H Ebadi, T V Zaqarashvili, and I Zhelyazkov, Astrophys. & Space Sci., 337 (2012a) 33.
15. J He, E Marsch, Ch Tu, and H Tian, Astrophys. J., 705 (2009) 217.
16. A Takeuchi and K Shibata, Astrophys. J., 546 (2001) L73.
17. R Fitzpatrick, Phys. of Plasma, 11 (2003) 3.
18. Z Fazel and H Ebadi, Iranian Journal of Physics Research, 14, 3 (2014) 73.
19. Z Fazel and H Ebadi, Astrophys. & Space Sci., 353(2014) 47.
20. T Yokoyama and K Shibata, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 48 (1996) 353.
)