A numerical study of the effect of the number of  turns of coil on the heat produced in the induction heating process in the 3d model

Shokri, A J; Tavakoli, M H; Sabouri Dodaran, A; Akhondi Khezrabad, M S

doi:10.29252/ijpr.18.3.408

A numerical study of the effect of the number of turns of coil on the heat produced in the induction heating process in the 3d model

Authors

A J shokri

M H Tavakoli

A Sabouri Dodaran

M S Akhondi Khezrabad

https://doi.org/10.29252/ijpr.18.3.408

Abstract

Computer modeling for the design of inductors for different applications in the induction heating process often seems to be necessary to save costs caused by the trial and error. In this paper, the effects of the number of loops in the induction heating process with the numerical solution of the Maxwell equations have been investigated using finite element method (FEM) and the COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS software package in three dimensions. Therefore, considering the effect of the number of coil turns on the amount and pattern of heat produced in the workpiece for special applications in the industry and technology is critical. This is because the number of coil turns is one of the important parameters in the design of induction heating systems. At first, a single turn coil is simulated in a three-dimensional model; then multi-turn coils with the turns number 2, 3, and 4 have been considered. The voltage of 200 V with the frequency of 1 KHz has been used, as applied to the coil, to serve as the source of electromagnetic fields. The results of numerical calculations show that the number of coil turns can have a significant effect on quantities such as distribution and intensity of magnetic flux density, eddy currents density in the workpiece, and the volume of heat produced in the coil and workpiece.

Keywords

induction heating process

finite element method

simulation

1. S Lupi, M Forzan, and A Aliferov, “Induction and Direct Resistance Heating”, Springer (2015) 1.
2. M Fisk, “Simulation of Induction Heating in Manufacturing”, Thesis, Luleå University of Technology (2008).
3. V Rudnev, D Loveles, R Cook, and M Black. “Handbook of Induction Heating”, Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, NY (2003) 100.
4. C Chaboudez, S Clain, R Glardon, D Mari, J Rappaz, and M Swierkosz, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 33, 1 (1997) 739.
5. J Jang and Y Chiu, Appl. Therm. Eng. 27 (2007) 1883.
6. M H Tavakoli, H Karbaschi, F Samavat, and E Mohammadi-Manesh, Journal of Crystal Growth 312 (2010) 3198.
7. K Gao, X Qin, Z Wang, Sh Zhu, and Z Gan, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 23 (2016) 125.
8. H Khodamoradi, M H Tavakoli, and K Mohammadi, Journal of Crystal Growth 421 (2015) 66.
9. X Zhou, “Heat Transfer During Spray Water Cooling Using Steady Experiments,” MS. Thesis. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (2009).
10. E Haye, “Industrial Solutions for Inductive Heating of Steels”, Thesis, Luleå University of Technology (2013).
11. L Zhang, “Numerical Modeling of Induction Assisted Subsurface Heating Technology”, Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2012).
12. R E Haimbaugh,“Practical Induction Heat Treating,” Thesis, Materials Park (2001).
13. M H Tavakoli, Crystal Growth & Desig 8, 2 (2008) 483.
14. X Zhou, B G Thomas, C A Hernandez, A H Castillejos, and F A Acosta, Journal of Applied Mathematical Modeling, 37 (2013) 3181.
15. J R Reitz, F J Milford, and R W Christy, “Foundation of Electromagnetic Theory”, John Wiley & sons, New York (1992).