Dynamical study of emitted particles from exited nucleus using Langevin approach

Naderi, D; Farmani, A

doi:10.29252/ijpr.18.3.445

Dynamical study of emitted particles from exited nucleus using Langevin approach

Authors

D Naderi

A Farmani

https://doi.org/10.29252/ijpr.18.3.445

Abstract

Using Langevin dynamics and the dissipative nature of the fission process, we have studied dynamical variations of nucleus from the formation of the compound nucleus to separation stage of two fission fragments. During this dissipative process, particles such as neutron, proton, alpha particle and gamma ray emit from the compound system. In the present work, the number of emitted particles using Langevin equation are calculated, dynamically. Obtained results for emitted alpha particles, protons and neutrons are compared with the experimental data. Also, we have studied the influence of the dissipative coefficient on these quantities. These results show that the dissipative coefficient affects the results, as well as the good agreement between the experimental data and theoretical results can be reproduced by using the dynamical approach.

Keywords

Langevin dynamics

Monte Carlo simulation

Compound Nucleus

viscosity coefficient

1. V Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. 52 (1937) 295.
2. A Gavron et. al., Phys. Lett. B 176 (1986) 312.
3. H A Weidenmuller, Nucl. Phys. A 471 (1987) 1c.
4. D J Hinde et. al., Nucl. Phys. A 452 (1986) 550.
5. J O Newton, D J Hinde, R J Charity, J R Leigh, J J M Bokhorst, A Chatterjee, G S Foote, and S Ogaza, Nucl. Phys. A 483 (1988) 126.
6. D J Hinde, Nucl. Phys. A 553 (1993) 255c.
7. S Hassani and P Grange, Phys. Lett. B 137 (1984) 281.
8. D J Hinde, D Hilscher and H Rossner, Nucl. Phys. A 502 (1989) 497c.
9. J P Lestone et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 1078.
10. M Thoennessen, D R Chakrabarty, M G Hermann, R Butsch, and P Paul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 2860.
11. W Ye, F Wu, and H W Yang, Phys. Lett. B 647 (2007) 118.
12. K Pomorskia, B Nerlo-Pomorska, A Surowiec, M Kowal, J Bartel, K Dietrich, J Richert,C Schmitt, B Benoit, E de Goes Brennand, L Donadille, and C Badimon, Nucl. Phys. A 679 (2000) 25.
13. D Naderi, Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014) 024614.
14. D Naderi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 23 (2014) 1450087.
15. S M Mirfathi and M R Pahlavani, Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008) 064612.
16. Y Jia and J-D Bao, Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 034601.
17. S Sohaili and E Ziaeiian, Iranian Journal of Physics Research 6, 2 (2006) 111.
18. M R Pahlavani, D Naderi and S M Mirfathi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 19 (2010)1451.
19. P Frobrich and I I Gontchar, Phys. Rep. 292 (1998) 131.
20. Yu A Anischenko, A E Gegechkori, and G D Adeev, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 74 (2011) 341.
21. D Naderi, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 40 (2013) 125103.
22. J E Lynn, ed., “The Theory of Neutron Resonance Reactions”, Clarendon, Oxford (1968) 325.
23. V G Nedoresov, Y N Ranyuk, “Fotodelenie Yader za Gigantskim Rezonansom”, Kiev, Naukova Dumka (1989) (in Russian).
24. H Ikezoe, N Shikazono, Y Nagame, T Ohtsuki, Y Sugiyama, Y Tomita, K Ideno, I Kanno, H J Kim, B J Qi, and A Iwamoto, Nucl. Phys. A 538 (1992) 299c