Calculation of hyperfine coupling constant and the g tensor of alanine radicals at different crystal temperatures based on Density Functional Theory (DFT)

Janbazi Roodbali, M; Taghipour Azar, Y; Ziaie, F

doi:10.29252/ijpr.18.4.713

Calculation of hyperfine coupling constant and the g tensor of alanine radicals at different crystal temperatures based on Density Functional Theory (DFT)

Authors

M Janbazi roodbali

Y Taghipour Azar

F Ziaie

https://doi.org/10.29252/ijpr.18.4.713

Abstract

In this paper, Density Functional Theory (DFT) was utilized for the calculation of the hyperfine coupling constant and the g tensor alanine radicals at different crystal temperatures. The cluster approach was used for considering the effects of crystal environment. In the cluster approach, the careful selection of the cluster size is very important for the geometry structure of alanine and the EPR parameters of alanine radicals. The geometry structure of alanine and the EPR parameters of alanine radicals showed a good agreement with the experiment data when 6 alanine molecules had hydrogen bonds with the central alanine or alanine radicals. Further, bigger clusters could even lead to an incorrect description of the geometry structure of alanine and EPR parameters of alanine radicals in the condensed phase.

Keywords

Alanine

density functional theory

g-tensor

Hyperfine coupling constant

cluster model

Hydrogen bond

1. D Regulla and U Deffner, The International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 33 (1982) 1101.
2. W McLaughlin and D Taylor, in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 47 (1996).
3. N Maltar-Strmecki and B Rakvin, Applied radiation and isotopes 63 (2005) 375.
4. V Nagy, J M Puhl, and M F Desrosiers, Radiation Physics and Chemistry 57 (2000) 1.
5. E Sagstuen and E O Hole, Electron paramagnetic resonance: A practitioner's toolkit pp.325 (2009) 382.
6. O F Sleptchonok, V Nagy, and M F Desrosiers, Radiation Physics and Chemistry 57 (2000) 115.
7. E Sagstuen, E O Hole, S R Haugedal, and W H Nelson, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 101 (1997) 9763.
8. E Sagstuen, A Sanderud, and E O Hole, Radiation research 162 (2004) 112.
9. P Lahorte, F De Proft, G Vanhaelewyn, B Masschaele, P Cauwels, F Callens, P Geerlings, and W Mondelaers, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 103 (1999) 6650.
10. F Ban, S D Wetmore, and R J Boyd, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 103 (1999) 4303.
11. R Declerck, E Pauwels, V Van Speybroeck, and M Waroquier, Physical Review B 74 (2006) 245103.
12. E Pauwels, H De Cooman, M Waroquier, E O Hole, and E Sagstuen, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 12 (2010) 8733.
13. E Pauwels, H De Cooman, M Waroquier, E O Hole, and E Sagstuen, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 16 (2014) 2475.
14. M Janbazi, Y Taghipour Azar, and F Ziaie, Iranian Journal of Physics Research 18 1 (2018) 139.
15. M Witwicki, J Jezierska, and A Ozarowski, Chemical Physics Letters 473 (2009) 160.
16. M E Ali, P M Oppeneer, and S N Datta, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 113 (2009) 5545.
17. M Witwicki and J Jezierska, Chemical Physics Letters 493 (2010) 364.
18. M Witwicki and J Jezierska, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 115 (2011) 3172.
19. L Zhu, W Yang, Y Y Meng, X Xiao, Y Guo, X Pu, and M Li, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 116 (2012) 3292.
20. V Barone and M Causa, Chem. Phys. Lett. 452 (2008) 89.
21. E Pauwels,V Van Speybroeck, M Waroquier, J. Phys. Chem. A 110 (2006) 6504.
22. E Pauwels, J Asher, M Kaupp, and M Waroquier, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 13 41 (2011) 18638.
23. E Sagstuen, E O Hole, S R Haugedal, and W H Nelson, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 101 (1997) 9763.
24. J W Sinclair and M W Hanna, J. Chem. Phys. 50 (1969) 2125.
25. K Matsuki and I Miyagawa, J. Chem. Phys. 76 (1982) 3945.
26. E A Friday and I Miyagawa, J. Chem. Phys. 55 (1971) 3589.
27. M S Lehmann, T F Koetzle, and W C Hamilton, J. Am. Chem, Soc. 94 (1972) 2657.