Iranian Journal of Physics Research

CMB dipole asymmetry through annular variance

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

M Valipour
M Farhang

Department of Physics, Shahid Beheshti University, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.47176/ijpr.19.4.37511
Abstract
Dipole asymmetry is among the most important anomalies in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). A dipole, if primordial, would challenge the isotropy of the Universe. In this work, we propose a novel method to find the direction of the dipole and its amplitude and assess its significance. The method is based on the comparison of annular variances on the sphere. We find the direction on the sphere around which the difference of the annular variances on the two hemispheres is maximized. By applying this algorithm on symmetric CMB simulations we get the distribution of the measured dipole amplitude for these null cases, providing us with the baseline for quantifying the significance of dipole amplitude of any other CMB maps. In particular, we find the statistical significance of the observed Planck dipole to be 1.6σ. Our simulations show that although the proposed method is not more powerful in detecting the dipole compared to other algorithms, its relatively low computational cost (performed in the pixel-space) is its advantage. This paves the way for a straightforward upgrade of the method which uses spherical caps instead of rings and thus, by increasing the number of pixels used in calculating the variance, improves the results significantly.

Keywords

CMB random field
statistical isotropy
variance
  1. Planck Collaboration P. Ade, et al., A & A 594 )2016) A16.

  2. D Schwarz, C Copi, D Huterer and G Starkman, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 184001.

  3. P Vielva, E Martínez-González, R B Barreiro, J L Sanz, and L Cayón, ApJ. 609 (2004) 22.

  4. M Cruz, M Tucci, E Martínez-González, and P Vielva, MNRAS. 369 (2006) 57.

  5. M Cruz, N Turok, P Vielva, E Martínez-González, and M A Hobson, Science 318 (2007) 1612.

  6. L Rudnick, S Brown, and L RWilliams, ApJ. 671 (2007) 40.

  7. J D McEwen, S M Feeney, M C Johnson, and H V Peiris, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 103502.

  8. J C Bueno Sanchez, Phys. Lett. B 739 (2014) 269.


9.     D Baumann, TASI Lectures on Inflation, arXiv : 0907.5424


10. H K Eriksen, F K Hansen, A J Banday, K M Górski, and P B Lilje, ApJ. 605 (2004a) 14.


11. Y Akrami, Y Fantaye, A Shafieloo, et al., ApJ. 784 (2014) L42.


12. C Gordon, ApJ. 656 (2007) 636.


13. A Moss, D Scott, J P Zibin, and R Battye, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 023014.


14. A Hajian and T Souradeep, ApJ. 597 (2003) L.


15. A Pontzen, and H V Peiris, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 103008.


16. N Bartolo, S Matarrese, M Peloso and A Ricciardone, JCAP. 1308 (2013) 022.


17. N Bartolo, S Matarrese, M Peloso and A Ricciardone, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 023504.


18. S Jazayeri, Y Akrami, H Firouzjahi, A R Solomon and Y Wang, JCAP. 1411 (2014) 044.

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us

تحت نظارت وف بومی