Proton therapy is one of the best methods of treatment for liver cancer. In this research, the main parts of proton therapy system, with passive scattering nozzle, including range-modulating wheel, energy-compensated contoured scatterer and collimators were simulated. Then the proton absorbed dose in healthy and tumoral tissues was calculated by simulating the proton therapy of liver tumors. Furthermore the secondary neutron dose, that increases the risk of secondary cancers, was calculated. For this purpose, the neutron equivalent absorbed dose in tumor and healthy tissues were calculated. Furthermore, the MIRD phantom was located in front of the output of the proton therapy system. By simulating the proton therapy for tumor in depth of 11 cm in the liver with mean source energy of 200 MeV, the absorbed dose of proton in tumor estimated as 3.32 × 10-12 Gy/particle that is 7.26 times more than proton dose in healthy parts of liver. This ratio showed that tumor absorbs the maximum dose, while the healthy tissue absorbs the minimum dose. In the next step, the same procedure was done with mean source energy of 180 MeV for tumor in depth of 6 Cm. According to the results, the proton absorbed dose in tumor was 1.94 × 10-12 Gy/particle that is 9 times more than proton absorbed dose in healthy tissue. Also the maximum neutron equivalent absorbed dose in healthy tissue is of the order of 10-14 Sv that can be ignorable in comparison with proton treatment effects of proton therapy.
A S Chadha, J R Gunther, C-E Hsieh, M Aliru, L S Mahadevan, B P Venkatesulu, et al., Radiotherapy and Oncology133 (2019) 54.
S Kim, B J Min, M Yoon, J Kim, D H Shin, S B Lee, S Y Park, S Cho, and D H Kim, Radiotherapy and Oncology98 (2011) 335.
P J Taddei, S Krishnan, D Mirkovic, P Yepe;s, and W Newhauser, PMC1099 (2009) 445.
H Paganetti, “Proton Therapy Physics” Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, (2007) 289.
A Perez, and W Newhauser, Med. Biol. 54 (2009) 993.
N A A Hashikin, C H Yeong, S Guatelli, B J J Abdullah, K H Ng, A Malaroda, A B Rosenfeld and A C Perkins, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 694 (2016) 012059.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Francis H Burr Proton Therapy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, M A 02114, USA , Med. Biol. 53 (2008) 1413
D Jette, and W Chen, Med. Biol.56 (2011) 131.
J Polf, and W Newhauser, Med. Biol. 50 (2005) 385.
Moayedian,S. Z. , Karimian,A. and Alamatsaz,M. (2022). Absorbed dose assessment due to proton and neutron particles in tumoral and healthy tissues of liver in proton-therapy using Monte Carlo method. Iranian Journal of Physics Research, 21(4), 821-832. doi: 10.47176/ijpr.21.4.21175
MLA
Moayedian,S. Z. , , Karimian,A. , and Alamatsaz,M. . "Absorbed dose assessment due to proton and neutron particles in tumoral and healthy tissues of liver in proton-therapy using Monte Carlo method", Iranian Journal of Physics Research, 21, 4, 2022, 821-832. doi: 10.47176/ijpr.21.4.21175
HARVARD
Moayedian S. Z., Karimian A., Alamatsaz M. (2022). 'Absorbed dose assessment due to proton and neutron particles in tumoral and healthy tissues of liver in proton-therapy using Monte Carlo method', Iranian Journal of Physics Research, 21(4), pp. 821-832. doi: 10.47176/ijpr.21.4.21175
CHICAGO
S. Z. Moayedian, A. Karimian and M. Alamatsaz, "Absorbed dose assessment due to proton and neutron particles in tumoral and healthy tissues of liver in proton-therapy using Monte Carlo method," Iranian Journal of Physics Research, 21 4 (2022): 821-832, doi: 10.47176/ijpr.21.4.21175
VANCOUVER
Moayedian S. Z., Karimian A., Alamatsaz M. Absorbed dose assessment due to proton and neutron particles in tumoral and healthy tissues of liver in proton-therapy using Monte Carlo method. Dear user; Recently we have changed our software to Sinaweb. If you had already registered with the old site, you may use the same USERNAME but you need to change your password. To do so at the first use, please choose, 2022; 21(4): 821-832. doi: 10.47176/ijpr.21.4.21175
