Iranian Journal of Physics Research

Sensors which can be used for remote quantum estimation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Hossein Rangani Jahromi 1
Seyed Mohammad Hosseiny 2
Mahdi Amniat-Talab 3

1 Professor (Assistant) Department of Physics Jahrom University

2 Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Urmia University,, Urmia, Iran

3 Department of Physics, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

https://doi.org/10.47176/ijpr.22.2.11402
Abstract
Quantum sensors have a significant advantage over their classic counterparts, and hence their practical application is of particular importance. However, in many practical scenarios, it is not possible to measure or estimate at close distances and endangers the security of the process. In this paper, with the help and inspiration of the quantum teleportation process, we propose the design of a sensor remotely estimating the parameter encoded into the quantum state of a quantum system. We show how the control over classical and quantum noises, affecting the sensor, can enhance the estimation. Moreover, the practical implementation of this project is discussed in detail.

Keywords

quantum sensors
quantum Fisher information
teleportation
Subjects
  1. M Hayashi, “Quantum information theory” Springer (2016).
  2. S Pirandola, et al., Nat. Photonics 12 (2018) 724.
  3. J P Tetienne, Phys. 17 (2021) 1074.
  4. C L Degen, F Reinhard, and P Cappellaro, Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 035002.
  5. Z Zhang and Q Zhuang, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 (2021) 043001.
  6. A Holevo, Math. Phys. 13 (1978) 379.
  7. V Giovannetti, S Lloyd, and L Maccone, Science 306 (2004) 1330.
  8. M G Paris, J. Quantum Inf. 7 (2009) 125.
  9. V Giovannetti, S Lloyd, and L Maccone, Photonics 5 (2011) 222.
  10. J Liu, Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53 (2019) 023001.
  11. G Tóth and I Apellaniz, Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 (2014) 424006.
  12. E Polino, et al., AVS Quantum Sci. 2 (2020) 024703.
  13. K Bongs, et al. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1 (2019) 731.
  14. L Pezze, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 035005.
  15. T Xiao, J Fan, and G Zeng, Npj Quantum Inf. 8 (2022) 1.
  16. T Tanaka, et al., Phys. Rev. A 105 (2022) 012411.
  17. N Shettell, E Kashefi, and D Markham, Rev. A 105 (2022) L010401.
  18. S Alipour and AT Rezakhani, Rev. A 91 (2015) 042104.
  19. A Rezakhani, M Hassani, and S Alipour, Rev. A 100 (2019) 032317.
  20. T Homayoun and K Aghayar, J. Phys. Res. 19 (2020) 515.
  21. M A Nielsen and I Chuang, “Quantum computation and quantum information” American Association of Physics Teachers (2002).
  22. H Rangani Jahromi, Lett. A 424 (2022) 127850.
  23. D Budker and M Romalis, Phys. 3 (2007) 227.
  24. G Balasubramanian, et al., Nature 455 (2008)
  25. F Dolde, et al., Nat. Phys. 7 (2011)
  26. P Neumann, et al., Nano letters 13 (2013) 2738.
  27. Y Yao, et al., Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014) 042336.
  28. H Okane, et al., Phys. Rev. A 104 (2021) 062610.
  29. Y Takeuchi, et al., Phys. Rev. A 99 (2019) 022325.
  30. P Yin, et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 (2020) 014065.
  31. C H Bennett, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993)
  32. S Pirandola, et al., Nat. Photonics 9 (2015) 641.
  33. Y H Luo, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 070505.
  34. D Llewellyn, et al., Nat. Phys. 16 (2020) 148.
  35. M Huo, et al., Sci. Adv. 4 (2018) eaas9401.
  36. F Kheirandish, S J Akhtarshenas, and H Mohammadi, Rev. A 77 (2008) 042309.
  37. A Motavallibashi, H Mohammadi, and A Akhound, JOSA B 38 (2021)
  38. A Naji, R Hamzehofi, and D Afshar, J. Phys. Res. 19 (2020) 656.
  39. A Rabeie and A Fatahizadeh, J. Phys. Res. 14 (2019) 381.
  40. M Ettefaghi and N Pour Rahimi, J. Phys. Res. 21 (2021) 479.
  41. R Hamzehofi, A Naji, and D Afshar, Res. Many. Sys. 11 (2021) 139.
  42. A Naji and M M. Zamani, IJAP 11 (2021) 68.
  43. R Raussendorf and H J Briegel, Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5188.
  44. N Sangouard, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 33.
  45. D Gottesman and I L Chuang, Nature 402 (1999) 390.
  46. D Bouwmeester, et al., Nature 390 (1997) 575.
  47. M Riebe, et al., Nature 429 (2004) 734.
  48. M Barrett, et al., Nature 429 (2004) 737.
  49. J F Sherson, et al., Nature 443 (2006) 557.
  50. P Y Hou, et al., Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 1.
  51. A Kumar, et al., Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 1.
  52. Z D Liu, et al., Phys. Rev. A 102 (2020) 062208.
  53. S Langenfeld, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 130502.
  54. G Bowen and S Bose, Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 267901.
  55. C W Helstrom, Stat. Phys. 1 (1969) 231.
  56. S L Braunstein and C M Caves, Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 3439.
  57. S L Braunstein, C M Caves, and G J Milburn, Phys. 247 (1996) 135.
  58. W Zhong, et al., Phys. Rev. A 87 (2013) 022337.
  59. W K Wootters, Rev. Lett. 80 (1998)
  60. C H Bennett, et al., Phys. Rev. A 54 (1996) 3824.
  61. A Rau, Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 (2009) 412002.
  62. R Jozsa, Mod. Opt. 41 (1994) 2315.
  63. S Oh, S Lee, and H W Lee, Rev. A 66 (2002) 022316.
  64. S Popescu, Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 797.
  65. S Massar and S Popescu, “Optimal extraction of information from finite quantum ensembles” World Scientific (2005).
  66. Y J Zhang, et al., Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 032112.
  67. K Berrada, B Raffah, and H Eleuch, Results Phys. 17 (2020) 103083.
  68. K Kraus, et al., Lect. Notes Phys. 190 (1983).
  69. Y L Li, X Xiao,and Y Yao, Rev. A 91 (2015) 052105.
  70. B Dalton, S M Barnett, and B Garraway, Rev. A 64 (2001) 053813.
  71. H P Breuer, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 021002.
  72. B Bellomo, R L Franco, and G Compagno, Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 160502.
  73. H Rangani Jahromi and M Amniat Talab, Phys. 360 (2015) 446.
  74. E M Laine and H P Breuer, Piilo, Sci. Rep. 4 (2014) 1.
  75. A D Zhu, et al., Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 022338.
  76. X H Li, F G Deng, and H Y Zhou, Rev. A 74 (2006) 054302.
  77. Y H Chou, et al., Sci. Rep. 8 (2018) 1.
  78. Y H Chou, et al., Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 1.

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us

تحت نظارت وف بومی