Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

2 Department of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan 45137-66731, Iran and School of Physics, Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics (IPM), P.O. Box 19395-5531, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In this paper, we have studied the dynamical phase diagram of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model using the notion of dynamical quantum phase transition in the ramped quench case. We have shown that, when the quench crosses both the critical points of the model, the phase diagram of the model includes two regions with dynamical quantum phase transition and no dynamical quantum phase transition. We have shown that if the sweep velocity is smaller than the critical value, the system shows dynamical quantum phase transition. If the quench crosses the single critical point, the system always shows the dynamical quantum phase transition

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. S Sachdev,” Quantum Phase Transition” Cambridge University Press (1999).
  2. A Polkovnikov, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 863.
  3. R Jafari and H Johannesson, Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 015701.
  4. R Jafari and H Johannesson, Rev. B 96 (2017) 224302.
  5. H T Quan, et al., Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 140604.
  6. M Heyl, Prog. Phys. 81 (2018) 054001.
  7. R Jafari, et al., Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 054302.
  8. A Bayat, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 030601.
  9. R Jafari, Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49 (2016) 185004.
  10. R Jafari, Rev. A 82 (2010) 052317.
  11. R Jafari and A Akbari, Europhys Lett. 111 (2015) 10007.
  12. U Mishra, et al., Phys. Rev. A 98 (2018) 052338.
  13. R Jafari and A Akbari, Rev. A 101 (2020) 062105.
  14. W P Su, J R Schrieffer, and A J Heeger, Rev. Lett. 42 (1979) 1698.
  15. P Jurcevic, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 080501.
  16. N Fläschner, et al., Nat. Phys. 14 (2017) 265.
  17. S Vajna and B Dóra, Rev. B 91 (2015) 155127.
  18. M Abdi, Rev. B 100 (2019) 184310.
  19. N Sedlmayr, et al. Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 064304.
  20. V Srivastav, U Bhattacharya, and A Dutta, Rev. B 100 (2019) 144203.
  21. P Uhrich, et al., Phys. Rev. B 101 (2020) 245148.
  22. U Mishra, R Jafari, and A Akbari, Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53 (2020) 375301.
  23. M Heyl and J C Budich, Rev. B 96 (2017) 180304.
  24. U Bhattacharya, S Bandyopadhyay, and A Dutta, Rev. B 96 (2017)180303.
  25. J C Budich and M Heyl, Rev. B 93 (2016) 085416.
  26. F Andraschko and J Sirker, Rev. B 89 (2014) 125120.
  27. N Sedlmayr, M Fleischhauer, and J Sirker, Rev. B 97 (2018) 045147.
  28. L Zhou, et al., Phys. Rev. A 98 (2018) 022129.
  29. A Khatun and S M Bhattacharjee, Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 160603.
  30. N Sedlmayr, et al., Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 064304.
  31. K Cao, et al., Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020) 014207.
  32. R Jafari, Rep. 9 (2019) 2871.
  33. H Lang, et al., Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 134310.
  34. R Puebla, Rev. B 102 (2020) 220302.
  35. S Zamani, R Jafari, and A Langari, Rev. B 102 (2020) 144306.
  36. R Jafari and A Akbari, Rev. A 103 (2021) 012204.
  37. M Sadrzadeh, R Jafari, and A Langari, Rev. B 103 (2021) 144305.
  38. L Pastori, S Barbarino, and J C Budich, Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 033259.
  39. M Heyl, Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 205701.
  40. S Sharma, et all., Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 144306.
  41. U Divakaran, S Sharma, and A Dutta, Rev. E 93 (2016) 052133.
  42. L D Landau,” Collected Papers of LD Landau” Pergamon (1965).
  43. C Zener, R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character. 137 (1932) 696

 

 

ارتقاء امنیت وب با وف ایرانی