Simulation of state transfer from atom to cavity radiation in atom-photon interaction in large detuning

Sadeghi, Mahmoud; Nosrati, Maryam

doi:10.47176/ijpr.22.2.31434

Simulation of state transfer from atom to cavity radiation in atom-photon interaction in large detuning

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Mahmoud Sadeghi

Maryam Nosrati

Department of Physics, University of Hormozgan, Bandar-e-Abbas, Iran

https://doi.org/10.47176/ijpr.22.2.31434

Abstract

In this research, atom-cavity entanglement in closed Jaynes – Cumming model has been used with the assumption of large detuning between atom and cavity, to simulate the state transfer from atom to cavity radiation. A two-level atom which is prepared in a half-half superposition between the ground and excited states, has been exposed to initially coherent radiation field which is far from resonance with the atom. Mixture of each subsystem, linear entropy, entanglement, Von Neumann entropy and Schmidt decomposition of composite system as a function of time, has been determined analytically, for the first time. Assuming large frequency differences between atom and radiation, the simulation is shown no energy is transferred between atom and radiation due to large detuning, even though atom-radiation entanglement took place. Also, it has been shown that a particular measurement on the atom in this composite entangled system, can project the composite system into a separable (non-entangled) state so that the radiation state is changed into a superposition of the coherent state which is called the cat state. The conditions required to transfer radiation into odd and even cat states have been particularly investigated.

Keywords

state transfer

quantum state engineering

cat states

simulation

20.1001.1.16826957.1401.22.2.20.2

Subjects

Optics and Photonics

M Dakna, L Knöll, and D G Welsch, Phys. J. D 3 (1998) 295.
S Deleglise, et al., Nature 455 (2008) 510.
K Vogel, V Akulin, and W P Schleich, Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1816.
V V Dodonov, Opt., B Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 4 (2002) R1.
S Y Lee and H Nha, Rev. A 82 (2010) 053812.
D F Walls, Nature 324 (1986) 210.
L-A Wu, M Xiao, and H Kimble, Opt. Soc. Am. A 4 (1987) 1465.
V Dodonov, I Malkin, and V Man'Ko, Physica 72 (1974) 597.
H Jeong, Rev .A 72 (2005) 034305.
T C Ralph, et al., Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 042319.
B Vlastakis, et al., J. Sci. 342 (2013) 607.
C Gerry and P Knight, J. Phys. 65 (1997) 964.
B Hacker, et al., Nat. Photonics 13 (2019) 110.
K Hammerer, et al., “Cavity Optomechanics “ Springer (2014).
A Ourjoumtsev, et al., Nature 448 (2007) 784.
W Schleich, M Pernigo, and F Le Kien, Rev. A 44 (1991) 2172.
J R Johansson, P D Nation, and F Nori, Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1760.
C M Savage, S L Braunstein, and D F Walls, Lett. 15 (1990) 628.
D Schuster, et al., Nature 445 (2007) 515.
C Gerry and P L Knight, “Introductory quantum optics “, Cambridge university press (2005 .(
E S Fry and T Walther, “Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics” Elsevier (2000)
L Vermeyden, MS thesis, University of Waterloo (2014).
W Tittel and G Weihs, arXiv preprint quant-ph/0107156 (2001)
M A Nielsen and I Chuang, “Quantum computation and quantum information” American Association of Physics Teachers (2002.(
A Pathak, “Elements of quantum computation and quantum communication” CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013).
M Horodecki, Quantum Inf. Comput. 1 (2001) 3.
R Horodecki, et all., Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 865.
W P Schleich, “Quantum optics in phase space “ John Wiley & Sons (2011(.