Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Energy Engineering and Physics Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, P.O.BOX: 4413-15875, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Nowadays, convolution/superposition(C/S) is used to calculate absorbed dose distribution by using the absorbed dose kernel(ADK). ADK describes the absorbed dose distribution per number of interaction at a small volume around the point of photon interaction. The purpose of this study is to calculate ADK and investigate its angular and radial behavior. In this study, ADK is calculated in a homogeneous water phantom in the polar coordinates by using the Monte Carlo Geant4 toolkit for monoenergetic photons with energies in the range 0.3MeV-5MeV. To study accurately, ADK is divided into several groups in order of produced charged particle set in motion at each photon interaction. Our result shows ADK rapidly decreases as the polar angle, with respect to the incident photon direction, is increased. As the radial distance from the interaction point increases, ADK is raised and then strongly decreased. ADK is symmetrically distributed around the point of interaction for low incident photon energy while forward distributed for high incident energy photons.
Keywords
Main Subjects
- A Boyer and E Mok, in “Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy” (1984) 14.
- T Mackie and J Scrimger, in “Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy” (1984) 36.
- A Boyer and E Mok, Medical physics 12 (1985) 169.
- T Mackie, J Scrimger and J Battista, Medical physics 12 (1985)
- A L Boyer and E C Mok, Medical physics 13(1986) 503.
- R Mohan, C Chui, and L Lidofsky, Medical physics 13 (1986) 64.
- A Ahnesjö P Andreo, and A Brahme, Acta Oncologica 26 (1987) 49.
- D Liu and R S Sloboda, Medical physics 41 (2014) 051701.
- A Iwasaki et al., Radiological physics and technology 4 (2011) 203.
- S A Naqvi M A Earl, and D M Shepard, Physics in Medicine & Biology 48 (2003) 2101.
- L Tillikainen et al., Physics in Medicine & Biology 53 (2008) 3821.
- A Ahnesjö, Medical physics 16 (1989) 577.
- D Finocchiaro, Plos one 15 (2020) e0236466.
- S Singh, biomedical physics & engineering 9 (2019) 613.
- A M Reinhart et al., The British journal of radiology 90 (2017) 20160426.
- S Kimura et al., Radiological physics and technology 4 (2011) 216.
- T Mackie et al., Physics in Medicine & Biology 13 (1988) 1.
- Dieudonné A et al., Journal of nuclear medicine 54 236 (2013).
- A Ahnesjö, in “8th International Conference on Computers in Radiotherap” (1984) 17.
- A Ahnesjö, M Saxner, and A Trepp, Medical physics 19 (1992) 263.
- S Bartzsch and U Oelfke, Medical physics 40 (2013) 111714.
- S A Graves, Medical physics 46 (2019) 5284.
- V Klimanov et al., Moscow University Physics Bulletin 71 (2016) 431.
- J Y Huang et al., Medical physics 40 (2013) 121721.
- C Janicki and J Seuntjens, Medical physics 31 (2004) 814.
- A M Bergman, K Otto and C Duzenli, Medical physics 31 (2004) 3279.
- B M Mendes, Radiation Physics and Chemistry 181 (2021) 109327.
- H Uusijärvi et al., Cancer biotherapy and radiopharmaceuticals 24 (2009) 416.
- E Mainegra‐Hing, D Rogers, and I Kawrakow, Medical physics 32 (2005) 685.
- S Agostinelli et al., Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 506 (2003) 250.
- J Allison et al., IEEE Transactions on nuclear science 53 (2006) 270.
)