Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Faculty of Basic Science, Department of Physics, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 -Faculty of Basic Science, Department of Physics, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran -Nanotechnology Research Institute, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
Abstract
Recently, coherent perfect absorbers have received much attention from researchers in the field of classical optics. Such absorbers, known as a time-reversal of lasers, provide perfect absorption of the incident light. Considering the very attractive features of these materials, in this paper, we investigate the quantum optics of these materials. To do this, we consider two coherent perfect absorber structures and assume two identical two-level atoms; one of which is prepared in its ground state and the other in the excited state, are placed on both sides of the coherent perfect absorber slabs. We compute the spontaneous emission rate, Lamb shift, and collective decay of atoms near two slabs, and then investigate the entanglement dynamics of the atomic system using the concurrence. We find that these parameters exhibit a damped oscillatory behavior with increasing the distance between the atoms and the slabs. In contrast to the classical regime, we also observe that these structures are not the perfect absorbers in the quantum regime.
Keywords
Main Subjects
- C Yan, et al., Laser Technol 101 (2018) 499.
- X Wang, et al., Express 26 (2018) 5488.
- X Jin, et al., Commun. 446 (2019) 44.
- M Pu, et al., Plasmonics 7 (2012) 733.
- J Z Song, et al., New J. Phys. 16 (2014) 33026.
- F Monticone, C A Valagiannopoulos, and A Alu, Rev. X 6 (2016) 41018.
- M Papaioannou, E Plum, and N I Zheludev, Acs Photonics 4 (2017) 217.
- R E Meymand, A Soleymani, and N Granpayeh, Commun. 458 (2020) 124772.
- D G Baranov, et al., Rev. Mater. 2 (2017) 1.
- S Huang and G S Agarwal, Express 22 (2014) 20936.
- Roger, et al., Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 7031.
- A N Vetlugin, Rev. A 104 (2021) 13716.
- E Amooghorban and M Wubs, Nanomaterials 13 (2023) 291.
- M M Behbahani, E Amooghorban, and A Mahdifar, Rev. A 94 (2016) 13854.
- S -A Biehs and G S Agarwal, Rev. A 96 (2017) 22308.
- R Tanaś and Z Ficek, Opt. B Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 6 (2004) S90.
- X Yin, et al., Rep. 5 (2015) 15367.
- Pu, et al., Opt. Express 20 (2012) 2246.