Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Physics, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs) have gained significant attention as a developing technology for clean and sustainable energy production. The electrolyte, a key component of SOFCs, is crucial in optimizing their performance. Enhancing oxygen ion conductivity in these electrolytes is essential for improving the efficiency and reducing the operating temperature of SOFCs. One effective approach is doping the electrolyte with impurity elements. Thus, the main objective of this research is to investigate the influence of yttrium doping on oxygen ion diffusion in zirconia, the most commonly used commercial electrolyte. Using Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, the effect of yttrium doping and its position on the activation energy was examined. The results indicate that yttrium, regardless of its doping position in zirconia, reduces the activation energy for oxygen ion diffusion. However, the position of the yttrium significantly affects the diffusion pathway, as oxygen prefers to diffuse through a path where the yttrium is absent. Furthermore, the results suggest that yttrium creates preferred oxygen vacancy sites within the structure.
Keywords
Main Subjects
- E D Coyle and R A Simmons, “Understanding the global energy crisis”, Purdue University Press (2014).
- T H Shin, et al., Sustainable Energy & Fuels 1 (2017) 103.
- S Dwivedi, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45 (2020) 23988.
- T S Lee, J N Chung, and Y -C Chen, Energy Conversion and Management 52 (2011) 3214.
- A B Stambouli and E. Traversa, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 6 (2002) 433.
- S Park, J M Vohs, and R J Gorte. Nature 404 (2000) 265.
- Q Xue, et al., Physical Review Applied 10 (2018) 14032.
- N Mahato, et al., Progress in Materials Science 72 (2015) 141.
- Y Mansilla, et al., Materials Today: Proceedings 14 (2019) 92.
- S Zhang, C Savaniu, and J T Irvine, ECS Transactions 91 (2019) 1111.
- T Yamaguchi, Catalysis Today 20 (1994) 199.
- E Długoń, et al., Surface and Coatings Technology 331 (2017) 221.
- G S , Kaliaraj, et al., Ceramics International 44 (2018) 14940.
- Grover, R. Shukla, and A. Tyagi, Scripta Materialia 57 (2007) 699.
- Savioli, and G.W. Watson, Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 21 (2020) 14.
- H Xu, et al., Journal of Power Sources 441 (2019) 227152.
- A Kushima, and B Yildiz, ECS Transactions 25 (2009) 1599.
- R Pornprasertsuk, et al., Journal of Applied Physics 98 (2005) 10.
- J Koettgen, et al., Chemistry Chemical Physics 20 (2018) 14291.
- L T Lam, V V Hung, and B D Tinh, Journal of the Korean Physical Society 75 (2019) 293.
- M Singh, D Zappa, and E Comini, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46 (2021) 27643.
- Q Xu, et al., Conversion and Management 253 (2022) 115175.
- A Chroneos, et al., Energy & Environmental Science 4 (2011) 2774.
- C Howard, R Hill, and B Reichert, Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science 44 (1988) 116.
- J P Perdew, K Burke, and M Ernzerhof, Physical Review Letters 77 (1996) 3865.
- H J Monkhorst and J D Pack, Physical Review B 13 (1976) 5188.
- J Yang, M Youssef, and B Yildiz, Physical Review B 97 (2018) 24114.
- D Packwood, et al., The Journal of Chemical Physics, 144 (2016) 164109.
- T A Halgren, and W N Lipscomb, Chemical Physics Letters 49 (1977) 225.
- Y Pan, and J Zhang,. Vacuum 187 (2021) 110112.
- J Li et al., Journal of Advanced Ceramics 6 (2017) 43.
- B Bondars, et al.,. Journal of Materials Science 30 (1995) 1621.
- G -M Rignanese, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17 (2005) 357.
- F Giustino, “Materials modelling using density functional theory: properties and predictions”, Oxford University Press (2014).
)