Solitonic excitations in quantum plasma in a weakly relativistic regime

Nargesi, Nastaran; Miraboutalebi, Sedigheh; Rajaei, Leila; Samavati, Katayoun

doi:10.47176/ijpr.24.4.01992

Solitonic excitations in quantum plasma in a weakly relativistic regime

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Nastaran Nargesi ¹

Sedigheh Miraboutalebi ¹

Leila Rajaei ²

Katayoun Samavati ¹

¹ Department of Physics, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Physics, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

https://doi.org/10.47176/ijpr.24.4.01992

Abstract

This paper studies the excitation of solitonic waves in a quantum plasma model within the weak relativistic regime. The model leads to a fourth-order nonlinear differential equation, which, due to its nonlinearity, introduces new and intriguing phenomena in the dynamics of the plasma environment. We successfully obtained stable and stationary solitonic solutions using the hyperbolic secant Sech-method without resorting to any simplifications. This approach, commonly known as the Tanh- method, is referred to as the sech- method here because the sech function is employed in deriving the solutions. The obtained stable and stationary solitonic waves are significant because they propagate with a constant size and shape in a highly dispersive plasma environment. These waves reveal bounded soliton waves for the vector potentials. Also, the density changes due to the influence of the thermal quantum effects are studied. It is observed that the group velocity of the solitonic solutions of the vector potential affects the density changes. The outcomes of this study and the dealing approach with this context help us better understand the dynamical phenomena of quantum plasmas.

Keywords

quantum plasma

solitonic wave

weak relativistic plasma

Sech method

Subjects

Plasma Physics

M Bonitz, N Horing, and P Ludwig, “Introduction to complex plasmas”, Springer Science & Business Media (2010).
A Mehramiz and M hosseinzade firouzi, Appl. Electromagn 6 , 1 (2018) 9.
P K Shukla and B Eliasson, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 52 ,12 (2010) 124040.
W Masood and B Eliasson, Plasmas 18 , 3 (2011) 034503.
D Roy and B Sahu, Space Res. 67, 3 (2021) 1039.
S Y El-Monier, et al., J. Phys. 88 (2024) 810.
S Chandra, G Manna, and D Mahanta, Scr. 99, 9 ( 2024) 095613.
F M Trukhachev, M M Vasiliev and O F Petrov, Plasma Phys. Rep. 48, 10 (2022) 1116.
W A Faridi, et al., Eng. J. 95 (2024) 247.
K Kumar, et al., Plasmas 30 ,7 (2023).
K Mima and S Eliezer, “Applications of Laser-Plasma Interactions”, Series in Plasma Physics, Taylor & Francis, (2008).
P Sprangle, E Esarey, and A Ting, Rev. A 41 (1990) 4463.
H Sahoo, et al., IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 50, 6 ( 2021) 1610.
D Farina and S Bulanov, Rev. lett. 86 (2001) 5289.
Y Feng and L Hou, Math. Phys. 2020, 1 ( 2020) 5602373.
M Lontano, S Bulanov, and J Koga, Plasmas 8, 12 (2001) 5113.
L Hadžievski, et al., Plasmas 9, 6 (2002) 2569.
V Berezhiani and S Mahajan, Rev. lett. 73, 8 (1994) 1110.
W Malfliet, J. Phys. 60, 7 (1992) 650.
A Jahangiri, et al., Lett. B 818 (2021) 136351.
S Miraboutalebi, F Ahmadi, and A Jahangiri, Lett. B 833 (2022) 137270.
N Nargesi, et al., Results Phys. 52 (2023)106877.
E Fan, Lett. A 277, 4-5 (2000) 212.
P A Andreev and A Y Ivanov, Plasmas 22, 7 (2015) 072101.
P A Andreev, Phys. 350 (2014) 198.
P A Andreev, Plasmas 22, 6 (2015).
M Ali, M Alquran, and O B Salman, Results Phys. 1, 37 (2022) 105462.
L Hadžievski, et al., plasmas 9, 6 (2002)2569.
N Gul and R Ahmad, Scr. 96, 5 (2021) 055602.