Thermodynamic analysis of 89Y and 166Er nuclei using the nuclear level density parameter within the framework of the GBCS and Ignatiuk models

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Physics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract
In this research, the thermodynamic properties of the nucleus have been investigated using the temperature-dependent level density parameter. Calculations have been carried out based on the BSC and Ignatyuk models. A well-known limitation of the BCS model is that the gap parameter drops to zero at the critical temperature, which leads to discontinuities and the appearance of singular points in the heat capacity curve. To overcome this problem, the gap parameter in the BCS model has been replaced with an order parameter derived from the generalized Ginzburg-Landau theory, and the resulting improved model was introduced as GBCS. Subsequently, the temperature-dependent level density parameter has been calculated using the GBCS and Ignatiuk models. Finally, by utilizing the temperature-dependent level density parameter, the thermodynamic quantities of the nucleus such as the nuclear level density, entropy, and heat capacity have been obtained using the mentioned models and compared with available experimental data.

Keywords

Subjects

1.       J Bardeen, L N Cooper, J R Schrieffer, Phys. Rev 108 (1957) 1175.
2.       L G Moretto, Nucl. Phys. A 185 (1972) 145.
3.       A N Behkami, J R Hulzenga, Nucl. Phys. A 217 (1973) 78.
4.       L G Moretto, Phys. Lett. B 40 (1972) 1.
5.       Kh Benam, V Dehghani, S A Alavi, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (2019) 105.
6.       N Dinh Dang, Z. Phys. A 335 (1990) 253.
7.       B Lauritzen, A Anselmino, P F Bortignon, R A Broglia, Ann. Phys 223 (1993) 216.
8.       A J Koning, S Hilaire, S Goriely, Nucl. Phys. A 810 (2008) 13.
9.       P Demetriou, S Goriely, Nucl. Phys. A 695 (2001) 95.
10.     T V Egidy, D Bucurescu, Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005) 044311.
11.    W Dilg, W Schantl, H. Vonach, Nucl. Phys. A 217 (1973) 269.
12.  A Gilbert, A G W Cameron, Can. J. Phys 43 (1965)1446.
12.     V A Plujko, et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 118 (2014) 240.
13.     Z Kargar, Z Amini Lary, A Anbaraki, Iran. J. Phys. Res. 13 (2013) 289.
14.    J P Lestone, Phys. Rev. Lett 70 (1993) 2245.
15.    J P Lestone, Phys. Rev. C 52 (1995) 1118.
16.    S Shlomo, J B Natowitz, Phys. Lett. B 252 (1990) 187.
17.    S Shlomo, J B Natowitz, Phys. Rev. C 44 (1991) 2878.
18.    B Canbula, R Bulur, D Canbula, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 929 (2014) 54.
19.    N Sowmya, et al., Phys. Rev. C 105 (2022) 044605.
20.    V Dehghani, S A Alavi, Eur. Phys. J.A 52 (2016) 306.
21.    A Rahmatinejad, et al., Phys. Rev. C 101 (2020) 054315.
22.    A Rahmatinejad, et all., Phys. Rev. C 103 (2021) 034309.
23.    A Rahmatinejad, et al., Phys. Rev. C 105 (2022) 4.
24.    Y Alhassid, et al., Phys. Rev. C 92 (2015) 024307.
25.    B Mühlschlegel, et al., Phys. Rev. B 6 (1972)1767.
26.    P Mohammadi, et al., Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014) 054304.
27.    A V Ignatyuk, et al., Sov. J. Nucl. Phys 21 (1975) 485.
28.    T Ericson, Adv. Phys 36 (1960) 425.
29.    P Möller, et al., FRDM (2012), At. Data. Nucl. Data Tables 109–110 (2016) 1.
30.    N R Dwivedi, et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 28 (2019) 1950061.
31.    T Q Huong Le, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2021)109.
32.    M R Mumpower, T Kawano, J L Ullmann, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2017) 024612.
33.    B V Kheswa, Acta Phys. Pol. B 54 (2023) 10-A1.
34.    J Damgaard, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 135 (1969) 432.
35.    S Cwiok, et al., Comput. Phys. Commun 46 (1987) 379.
36.    Z Patyk, A Sobiczewski, Nucl. Phys. A 533 (1991) 132.
37.    E Melby et al., Phys. Rev. C 63 (2001) 044309.
38.    M Guttormsen et al., Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014) 044.

تحت نظارت وف بومی