Prediction of diabetes using classical and quantum support vector machines

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

2 AriyaQuanta Center for Quantum Computing, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Blood glucose is one of the key indicators influencing the body’s metabolic performance. Accurate prediction and proactive management of this parameter are of paramount clinical importance. In this context, the analysis and evaluation of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms for processing medical data and enhancing the predictive accuracy of health-related models have emerged as cutting-edge research directions in recent studies. Leveraging the principles of quantum physics and computation, QML algorithms serve as a promising alternative to classical methods for predicting chronic diseases. By mapping classical data into a quantum feature space and exploiting intrinsic quantum properties such as superposition and entanglement, these algorithms significantly enhance the ability to detect complex and latent patterns within datasets. In this study, the dataset was first preprocessed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction and noise suppression. Subsequently, the predictive performance of two quantum machine learning models—the Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) and the Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC)—was evaluated and compared with that of the classical Support Vector Machine (SVM) for blood glucose level prediction. The results indicate that the QSVM model achieves a prediction accuracy of 90%, outperforming the classical SVM, which attained an accuracy of 74.4%. Moreover, the hybrid classical–quantum VQC model demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 94.2%, thereby establishing it as the most effective approach for blood glucose level forecasting in this experimental setting.

Keywords

Subjects

1.     M Fisher, J. Diabetes Endocr. Pract. 5 (2022) 135.
2.     H Naz and S Ahuja, J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 19 (2020) 391.
3.     H Zhou, R Myrzashova and R Zheng, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2020 (2020) 148.
4.     P L Panuganti, S N Hinkle, S Rawal, L G Grunnet, Y Lin, A Liu and C Zhang, Nutrients 10 (2018) 938.
5.     H Gupta, H Varshney, T K Sharma, N Pachauri and O P Verma, Complex Intell. Syst. 8 (2022) 3073.
6.     J Biamonte, P Wittek, N Pancotti, P Rebentrost, N Wiebe and S Lloyd, Nature 549 (2017) 195.
7.     V Kecman, Support Vector Machines: Theory and Applications, Springer, Berlin (2005) 1.
8.     C J Burges, Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2 (1998) 955.
9.     O Zang, G Barrué and T Quertier, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Quantum Eng. Sci. Technol. Ind. Serv., Springer, Cham (2025) 270.
10. J Romero, J P Olson and A Aspuru-Guzik, Quantum Sci. Technol. 2 (2017) 045001.
11. A Macaluso, L Clissa, S Lodi and C Sartori, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Sci., Springer, Cham (2020) 591.
12. W R Khan, M A Kamran, M U Khan, M M Ibrahim, K S Kim and M U Ali, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2025 (2025) 1351522.
13. J R McClean, J Romero, R Babbush and A Aspuru-Guzik, New J. Phys. 18 (2016) 023023.
14. O Farooq, M Shahid, S Arshad, A Altaf, F Iqbal, Y A M Vera and I Ashraf, Sci. Rep. 14 (2024) 19521.
15. D Maheshwari, B Garcia-Zapirain and D Sierra-Sosa, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Signal Process. Inf. Technol., IEEE, Piscataway (2020) 1.
16. M Schuld, arXiv:2101.11020 (2021).
17. N Singh and S R Pokhrel, arXiv:2501.08205 (2025).
18. V Havlíček, A D Córcope, K Temme, A W Harrow, A Kandala, J M Chow and J M Gambetta, Nature 567 (2019) 209.
19. N Innan, M A Z Khan, B Panda and M Bennai, Quantum Inf. Process. 22 (2023) 374.
20. D Sierra-Sosa, J D Arcila-Moreno, B Garcia-Zapirain and A Elmaghraby, Comput. Mater. Contin. 67 (2021) 1849.

تحت نظارت وف بومی