Document Type : Original Article

Author

Faculty of Physics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Mass composition of cosmic rays and thus determining their sources, especially at high energies, is one of the most important parts of astroparticle physics and cosmic ray science which also can help to know the universe better. Many different methods have been used to estimate the mass composition so far, which the most important of them has been done by Pierre Auger observatory group. In present work, in order to estimate the mass composition of cosmic rays, two different ways (first using from muonic component and second, maximum atmospheric depth) are used which they have been done by comparing experimental data and simulated ones. An increase in the mass composition and low flux of photons is observed at high energies. The diagram of maximum atmospheric depth in terms of energy, which is produced by extrapolation and interpolation statistical method, raises and falls meaningfully that is compatible to the results of Pierre Auger observatory. At higher energies, the percentage of primary particles have a tendency to heavier particles and in low energies the primary particles are lighter. Also, the most important breaks in the energy spectrum of cosmic rays are seen.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. J Linsley, 8th ICRC 4 (1963) 77.
  2. A M Hillas, Phys. 31 (2005) R95.
  3. D Allard, E Parizot, and A V Olinto, Phys. 27 (2007) 61.
  4. R Aloisio, V Berezinsky, P Blasi, et. al., Phys. 27 (2007) 76.
  5. R Ulrich, R Engel, and M Unger, Rev. D, 83 (2011) 054026.
  6. R Engel, D Heck, and T Pierog, Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 61 (2011) 467.
  7. J Knapp, D Heck, S J Sciutto, M T Dova, and M Risse, Astroparticle Physics, 19 (2003) 77.
  8. The Pierre Auger Collaboration, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 798(2015) 172.
  9. A Letessier-Selvon et al. (Pierre Auger Collab.), Proc. 33rd Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2013).
  10. K H Kampert, M Unger, Astroparticle Physics, 35 (2012) 660.
  11. A Aab et al.(Pierre Auger Collaboration), Rev. D90 (2014) 12.
  12. Pierre Auger Collaboration (2021), Auger Open Data release 1-2021
  13. D Heck et al., Report FZKA-6019 (1998), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe.
  14. S Ostapchenko, Phys. B. Proc. Suppl. 151 (2006) 143.
  15. H Fesefeldt, Report PITHA-85/02 (1985).
  16. J N Capdevielle et al., “The Karlsruhe Extensive Air Shower Simulation Code CORSIKA”, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, KfK (1992) 4998.
  17. J Nishimura and K Kamata, Theor. Phys. 6 (1958) 93.
  18. K Greisen, Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 10 (1960) 63.
  19. A Aab et al. (Pierre Auger Collaboration), Instrum. Meth. 798 (2015) 172.
  20. T Antoni et al., Phys. 24 (2005) 1.
  21. P Bhattacharjee and G. Sigl, Rep. 327 (2000) 109.
  22. J Abraham, et. al., (Pierre Auger collaboration) Astroparticle Physics 29 (2008) 243.
  23. N Busca, D Hooper, and E W Kolb, Rev. D73 (2006) 123001.
  24. A Aab et al.(Pierre Auger Collaboration) Rev. D 91 (2015) 032003.

ارتقاء امنیت وب با وف ایرانی